Saturday, October 03, 2009

Third Party Spending at the Euro elections

Inspired by Phil's post on minor parties election spending I thought I'd geek it up and take a dip into the third party election spending for the European elections earlier this year.

Third Parties are organisations or individuals who incur spending during the election but are not running candidates that can back or oppose specific candidates but usually raise specific issues. The summary of the spending is as follows;

Name of Third Party England (£) Wales (£) Scotland (£) N. Ireland (£) Total Expenditure






Board of Deputies of British Jews 30,656.27 2,066.72 1,722.26
34,445.25

ANIMALS






League Against Cruel Sports 865.8 144.45 288.8 144.45 1,443.50
Vote Cruelty Free 1,629.20 181.02 181.02 181.02 2,712.26

ANTI-FASCIST





Searchlight 134,469 1,720 1,220
137,409
Unite Against Fascism 77,176 3,303 6,508
86,987

UNIONS






USDAW 3,028 187 389
3,604
National Union of Teachers 25,194
- - 25,194
Public and Commercial Services Union 57,357 5,308 7,364 4,765 74,794


So if we look at the breakdown a bit the teachers union made £ 6,450 of donations to UAF plus a token £ 65 to Searchlight for their anti-fascist campaigns whilst the PCS union declared £ 16,400 expenditure on Love Music Hate Racism and a more modest £ 346 donation to its parent organisation, UAF.

Another point of note on the anti-fascist spending is that the Mirror, who helped fund a vast number of anti-fascist leaflets, chipped in to the tune of
£ 24,122 and 50 pence. Kudos.

7 comments:

Jim Jay said...

The other story to this is the spending of the minor parties and how it paid off vote wise. Here it goes, most expensive first for those I could be bothered to work out (or Phil had done already);

Mebyon Kernow
13,886 GBP 14,922 Votes
93 pence per vote

Socialist Party of Great Britain
3,760 GBP 4050 votes
92 pence per vote

Christians
222,251 GBP 249,493 Votes
89 pence per vote

No2EU
118,326 GBP 153,236 votes
77 pence per vote

Scottish Socialist Party
4,733 GBP 10,404 votes
45 pence per vote

Animals Count
4,512 GBP 13,201 Votes
34 pence per vote

Scottish Greens
11,108 GBP 80,442 Votes
14 pence per vote

English Democrats
37,500 GBP 279,801 Votes
13 pence per vote

Socialist Labour
5,354 GBP 173,115 votes
3 pence per vote!

Jim Jay said...

Oh - and the winner is... Libertas whose expenditure of 98,050 (not including 45,000 lost deposits) compared to their vote of 73,544 makes an impressive 1.33 GBP per vote.

Joe Otten said...

Do we think the anti-fascist campaigning worked at all? It looks like it might have got the fascist vote out that might otherwise not have bothered.

pluralprogressive said...

I still can't get over the SLP's 3p per vote. What's their secret? :P

Jim Jay said...

The SLP's secret is not to have a campaign and therefore spend very little money then plonk the word socialism and arthur scargill on the ballot paper. Cunning strategy but not sure I want to copy it!

Did the anti-fascist campaigning work? Sadly I think the explicitly anti-fascist organisations tend to only have a resonance with those who already oppose fascism (which, granted, is most of us).

There's an ongoing reassessment of the tactics and how we deal with the BNP and I don't think it can be left to the usual suspects to make those decisions.

Some parts of the strategy I think work better than others. Exposing the BNP members - their convictions (both criminal and ideological), their uselessness as councillors, etc. Name calling and throwing our hands up in horror every time one of these saddos appear is less useful to my mind.

Strategist said...

Craig Murray calculated on his website (sorry, can't find the link) that his Norwich North independent campaign in June cost him around £GBP40 per vote - and that was to him personally, as he had no other funding!

He was suitably philosophical about it.

Jim Jay said...

I did feel sorry for Craig, he's a good guy who has been noticeably depressed ever since which is a real shame as I miss his blog contributions. His vote was actually respectable for what his candidacy was but I know he had his sights set far higher.

We did try to warn him but obviously as people who were standing ourselves it's difficult to appear unbiased.

He may well have the record of pounds per vote - I'd certainly like to hear about it if there are others with an even higher ratio.